Methyl Bromide Alternatives Studies 1997-1999

Gina Fernandez - Dept. of Hort. Sci.,
Frank Louws - Plant Pathology,
Gordon Miner - Soil Science
Eric Bish - Dept. of Hort. Sci.,
Barclay Poling - Dept. of Hort. Sci.

North Carolina State University


What is the current phase out schedule?

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is currently phasing out the use of methyl bromide. Methyl bromide production and importation will be reduced from 1991 levels as follows:

25% reduction in 1999
50% reduction in 2001
70% reduction in 2003
100% reduction in 2005

What research is underway at NCSU?

In response to this phase-out, researchers at North Carolina State University have been investigating alternatives to methyl bromide as a soil fumigant in strawberry production since 1997. Studies underway include the chemical alternatives 61.1%1,3-dichloropropene:34.7% chloripicirn (TeloneŽ C-35), dazomet (BasamidŽ), and metam sodium (VapamŽ). Non-chemical alternatives include plant residues, solar heating, composting, and biological control agents. The latter two alternatives will be discussed in another report in these proceedings (Grabowski et al).

Trials were established in Clayton, Bunn, Plymouth and Fletcher, NC in 1997. In Plymouth, Vapam, Basamid, Telone-chloropicrin, methyl bromide, solarization, solarization/cabbage residue and compost were applied to the same plots two consecutive years. In Clayton, Vapam, Basamid, Telone-choloropicirn and methyl bromide were applied to two separate fields 1997-8 and 1998-9 production seasons. At Fletcher, Telone-chloropicrin, methyl bromide were applied to the same plots two consecutive years. The cultivar Chandler was used in Plymouth, Bunn and Clayton. At Fletcher, Chandler, Jewell, Latestar, Northeaster and Cavendish were yields were evaluated in response to the various fumigants.

What are the results so far?

Plymouth. -Year 1 (1997-8), there were no differences in marketable yield between the chemical and non chemical alternatives (Table 1).

-Year 2 (1998-9) yields were equivalent in all chemically fumigated plots and markedly lower in all non fumigated plots (Table 1).

-Visible pest problems in non fumigated plots (solarization, compost and control) were primarily weeds in both production seasons.

-All three of the fumigated plots had a high amount of cull fruit loss primarily to diseases (gray mold).

-Although yields were lower in solarization plots fruit quality in solarization plots was superior to all other treatments. Clayton.

-First years results at Clayton were reported in the 1998 Southeastern Strawberry Expo Proceedings (p 55-6).

-In the 1998-9 production season, plots fumigated methyl bromide, T-C35, Basamid and Vapam had equivalent total, marketable and cull yields (Table 2).

Fletcher. -There were no differences in yields between non fumigated plots and those fumigated with either chemical (Table 3).

-Marketable yield was very low, due to severe disease pressure (Table 3).

-Chandler had the highest marketable yield (16225 lbs/acre), followed by Latestar (10505 lbs/acre), Jewell (9152 lbs/acre) and Northeaster (9152 lbs/acre).

Bunn. See separate report (Grabowski et al).

Summary

Methyl bromide is used by the majority of plasticulture strawberry growers in North Carolina as a preplant soil fumigant. Thus far all alternative fumigants we have studied have the potential to control pests currently controlled by methyl bromide. However, long term integration of any of these alternatives into current production systems will depend on availability of product, mode of application, economics, long term control of pests and weeds and grower acceptance. In all these cases, adoption of any alternative will likely involve the adaption of new cultural practices.


Table 1. Methyl bromide alternatives, Chandler yield components, Plymouth, NC
mmm
Total Yield (lbs/acre)
Marketable Yield (lbs/acre)
Cull Yield (lbs/acre)
Berry Weight (g)
Treatment
1997-98
1998-99
1997-98
1998-99
1997-98
1998-99
1997-98
1998-99
Compost (1) (MB 97-98)
58592
14960
22260
13260
6294
217
15.6
15.6
Control (2)
21185
16490
17731
16150
3416
235
15.5
15.8
MB (3)
27172
23290
22029
22270
5104
235
15.4
15.7
Sol/cabbage (4)
25673
14960
22336
14110
3301
217
16.9
13.8
Sol (5)
25215
15810
22336
14790
2878
220
17.1
14.3
T-C35 (6)
29590
19720
23373
18530
6179
228
17
14.8
Vapam (7)
29705
24310
24524
23290
5143
235
17
15.3
LSD
4202
7990
ns
801
2621
ns
1.3
ns

1. Fumigated with methyl bromide 98% in fall of 1997, compost incorporated fall of 1998
2. No fumigation.
3. Methyl bormide 98%
4. Solarization and cabbage residue
5. Solarization
6. Telone Chloropicrin 35%
7. Metam sodium

Table 2. Methyl bromide alternatives, Chandler yield components, Clayton, NC 1997-98
Treatment
Total Yield (lbs/acre)
Marketable Yield (lbs/acre)
Cull Yield (lbs/acre)
Berry Weight (g)
MB (1)
37910
34009
3901
15.9
T-C35 (2)
37140
33107
4033
15.8
Basamid (3)
34512
31156
3355
16.5
Vapam (4)
34978
31574
3404
16.2
Control (5)
27553
25333
2221
17.7
1. Methyl bromide 98%
2. Telone Chloropicrin 35%
3. Dazomet
4. Meta Sodium
5. No fumigation

Table 3. Methyl bromide alternatives, Fletcher, NC 1997-98
Treatment
Marketable Yield (lbs/acre)
Total Yield (lbs/acre)
% Marektable
Berry Weight (g)
% Cull
Control
10221
15984
64.7
19.9
21
MB (1)
10098
152442
67
19.7
22.5
T-C35 (2)
11122
17195
66.7
18.9
20.7

1. Methyl bromide 98%
2. Telone Chloropicrin 35%

Click here to return to the Proceedings page